Who I Am or Who Am I | Which is Correct?, Examples on How To Use Who I Am or Who Am I

Who I Am or Who Am I: Which is correct? Both the statements are correct from a different perspective. ‘Who am I’ is used to question oneself about our own personality. Whereas ‘Who I am’ is the part of a sentence or an indirect question. Both the questions are correct as per English grammar.

Who am I is a question a person asks oneself. For example, I don’t understand who am I, sometimes. Who I am can be used as a part of a sentence or question, such as Do you know who I am? If we observe the context of both the sentence is different.

In case you are presenting yourself in a show, it is smarter to utilize “Who I am”, Then you can clarify the individual you are and it sounds more certain than “Who am I?”. Both the questions are correct in the way they are used in statements.

There are many examples of statements where we can use both questions. Let us see here in this article, what actually both the questions mean with examples.

What is “Who Am I”?

‘Who am I’ is the question for which the answer is our identity. Our character is our comprehensive arrangement of recollections, experiences, sentiments, contemplations, connections, and qualities that characterize who every one of us is.

Character is a basic part of understanding what our identity is. Why? Since we can separate character into parts (values, encounters, relationship).

Who am I? Is an inquiry when we reflect about ourselves in self-disclosure. As such, this could be a period in your life when you find your motivation throughout everyday life.

We likewise utilize this in case you are asking your companions what character/group you are at the point at which you are playing a game.

What is “Who I Am”?

As I said previously, Who I am is normally a piece of a sentence or backhanded inquiry. We change the request for the subject and the action word when we utilize roundabout inquiries.

‘Who am I’ is a direct question and ‘Who I am’ is used as an indirect question.

In this subsequent inquiry, the significance is not quite the same as the primary inquiry. In the main inquiry, you are scrutinizing your reality. The subsequent inquiry implies that the speaker accepts he/she is an individual of significance and is astonished that the other individual doesn’t know about this.